Survey Reveals Surprising Results
A recent survey raised the question of how the increase in tourism numbers should be dealt with. Almost 2/3 of those participating opted for strict visitor quotas and caps. Let’s explore why this result may be surprising. See the survey and corresponding results:
Madeira is attracting more tourists than ever, which brings both benefits and challenges. What do you think should be done? 📊✨
Madeira needs strict visitor quotas and caps to protect resources and the local way of life: 62%
Tourism should be taxed more, so that numbers decrease naturally: 9%
Tourism is important for Madeira – let it evolve naturally without interference: 26%
I have another idea – share it in the comments! 3%
Why These Results Are Surprising
At first glance, the strong support for strict visitor quotas (62%) appears surprising. Such hard limits - especially if they immediately lead to fewer visitors coming to Madeira - would actually hurt Madeira’s economy. If fewer people visit, local businesses - many of which depend on tourism - would suffer. Investments made over the years to support tourism might also be lost.
A better alternative could be tourism taxes. A small tax, such as 2 euros, would not stop most visitors. But adjusting the tax rate gradually could help manage tourist numbers more flexibly. This approach gives policymakers a tool to manage the flow of tourists without risking long-term economic harm.
In short, while both options aim to reduce tourist pressure, taxation has a more balanced effect and would prevent the heavily dependent economy from suffering less while actually generating much-needed revenue. If done right, it could even improve the tourism sector by giving businesses time and space to adapt.
What Could Have Been Done Differently
Looking back, the wording of the survey options may have influenced the results. The first choice mentioned benefits like protecting resources and local life, which made it more attractive. Option two didn’t include any positive effects, even though it also aimed to reduce tourist pressure. This imbalance may have led more people to choose the first option. A more neutral phrasing could have produced a clearer picture of public opinion.
Madeira’s Economy Must Lower Its Dependency on Tourism
If Madeira wants to grow and raise the average wage, it must reduce its dependence on tourism. While tourism brings money and jobs, many of these jobs are low-paid. It also puts pressure on local infrastructure and the natural environment.
However, it’s not easy for a small, mountainous island to attract other industries. There is little space for agriculture or manufacturing. That means Madeira’s best chance is to develop other service-based sectors - such as technology, remote work hubs, or knowledge industries. These areas can bring :
better-paid jobs
long-term stability
a more sustainable economy
This shift is essential if the island wants to solve the many economic and social challenges it faces - challenges that will only become harder to manage in the future. The survey didn’t directly ask about this issue, but the need for economic diversification appears evident.
Care for a share?
Comments